Varvara Gracheva vs Alycia Parks Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In recent months, examining the second serve performance shows that Parks has won 39.46% of her points on the second serve, slightly trailing Gracheva, who has secured 40.97%. This metric is a significant predictor of match success. Additionally, when it comes to return games, Parks has demonstrated stronger statistics, capturing 49.79% of her opponent's second serve points, while Gracheva has managed 47.96%. For first serve returns, Gracheva leads with a 34.19% success rate compared to Parks' 28.82%.

Focusing on handling pressure situations, Parks has successfully saved 50.49% of breakpoints faced. In comparison, Gracheva has a breakpoint save percentage of 48.78%, making this information valuable for in-game betting predictions. When analyzing overall performance over the past year, Parks has won 60% of her matches, with a win-loss record of 45 to 30. Gracheva trails slightly, winning 52.73% of matches and holding a win-loss record of 29 to 26.

Evaluating the best performing surfaces for each player, Parks has excelled on indoor hard courts, boasting a 66% win rate (W/L 37/19), while her performance declines on clay, winning 45% (W/L 58/71). Conversely, Gracheva achieves her best results on clay with a 66% win rate (W/L 142/74), whereas her weakest results are on grass, winning only 36% (W/L 4/7). These surface preferences could play a crucial role in the match's outcome.

When comparing the level of events each player has participated in over the last year, Parks has primarily played in Challengers/ITF tournaments, securing a high win rate of 78.13% (W/L 25/7). Meanwhile, Gracheva has participated in more main tour events, achieving a 42.11% win rate (W/L 8/11). The quality of opponents faced is also telling; Parks has competed against opponents with an average rank of 206.35, whereas Gracheva has faced players with an average rank of 150.

If this match extends to a deciding set, historical data shows Parks would have the upper hand, winning 61% of such sets in the past year, compared to Gracheva's 45%. In terms of break point conversion, recent performance indicates that Gracheva is more efficient, converting 42.45% of opportunities against Parks' 30.42%. These stats demonstrate Gracheva's potential edge in critical moments.

Taking into account these diverse statistics, Gracheva appears to have a slight overall advantage due to her superior breakpoint conversion and experience against higher-ranked opponents. Nonetheless, Parks' remarkable record in deciding sets and on indoor hard courts might provide her with an opportunity for victory if the match enters a high-pressure phase.